It has layers of customization and an intuitiveness that is lacking in other apps.
![finding copyright symbol on keyboard windows 10 finding copyright symbol on keyboard windows 10](https://dt.azadicdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/alt-codes3.jpg)
But Avid's is not the industry standard for no reason. I appreciate that there are many other options out there for NLE's, some of which have as you say a much more efficient interface. Seems you are unaware of some of the main functions of MCA. How are you doing it that takes so long?ĪND to drag a clip from the bin to the timeline: drag the clip from the bin to the timeline. The whole fact that it's NON-LINEAR makes it more like film cutting, not linear tape editing.īTW when I want to edit a title I hit 1 button, edit said title and hit save. Also there used to be a Steenbeck like controller for scrolling through clips etc. It was originally actually designed to be like film editing. I dare say that no other NLE, not even your vaulted Affinity system was customized right out of the box. That is the beauty of the Avid interface, it gives you the option to set it up to best suit your needs. The point is, what may be a simple as pie to you may be outright silly or confusing to another editor. Tool sets and all the other intermediate steps that make the Avid Would extend to allow the editor to dispense with three-point editing, My only wish would be that Avid's vaunted interface programmability I think a major overhaul could make this box much quicker and more The industry standard there was no need to change the basic interface. Obviously the box has evolved a lot since then but as the Avid became Old-fashioned the whole Avid interface is, not surprising when youĬonsider it was essentially designed in the 80's for a whole generation I suppose one of my main observations, though, is how The bottom line is I have a more powerful editing system that is much slower and, in my mind, unnecessarily cumbersome to use.įair enough.
#Finding copyright symbol on keyboard windows 10 code#
In the Affinity, we can digitize them with timeĬode and the Affinity builds a time code track in the Media Processor. Using these in theĪvid is very difficult. I use a lot of time of day time code source reels.
![finding copyright symbol on keyboard windows 10 finding copyright symbol on keyboard windows 10](https://digilord.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/server.digimetriq.com/uploads/2021/01/word-image-563.png)
Only slow, it also locks you in and there is the potential for Never required any rendering at all for any effect. Playhead over the point where you want to make your edit, click on XĪlso, the amount of rendering needed caught me off guard. Your bin right to the timeline in the sequence (no intermediate step of Then you close the box and the text is changed.Īnd regarding a basic edit, in the Affinity you just drag the clip from Title, you just double click on the clip and a new box opens in which In the Affinity, for example, all of the Avid tool sets are tabs thatĪre always open at the bottom of the screen. Simpler to do a basic edit or that I could edit a title, or colorĬorrect a clip without a whole rigamorole of putting the Avid into aĭifferent tool set, doing my function, then reverting back to the The result, compared to the Affinity, is a minimum of double theĬommands to achieve the same function, sometimes as many as four timesĭon't get me wrong, the Avid is a much deeper software, and the number Tremendous amount of switching back and forth from one mode to another.Īnd I am still trying to figure out why that's needed. Have to put it in that mode and then you do the function.
![finding copyright symbol on keyboard windows 10 finding copyright symbol on keyboard windows 10](https://image.shutterstock.com/image-photo/computer-keyboard-copyright-symbol-600w-323410493.jpg)
The bottom line is that the Avid asks you what you want to do, you then Regardless of how I design the interface, is Avid's basic idea ofĮditing is very different than what I did for 17 years on the